"Alongside" means placed on the quay next to the ship, in a barge alongside, or in another agreed pre-loading position. It does
mean loaded on board. That distinction — one word — is what separates FAS from FOB, and it decides who is exposed to loading damage, crane fees, stevedoring costs and vessel waiting time.
FAS is rarely the right choice for containerised consumer goods — but it has a real, active place in the world of bulk, breakbulk and project cargo. Typical examples:
A UK importer buys 240 tonnes of steel structural sections on FAS Antwerp terms.
The loading cost matters: Under FOB, the £2,800 stevedoring at Antwerp would have been the seller's cost (already included in the FOB price). Under FAS, it's an explicit line the buyer has to arrange, book, contract and manage. On a straightforward stevedoring lane like Antwerp this is manageable. On less predictable lanes (project cargo, remote ports) it can produce nasty surprises.
When FAS makes sense as a buyer
- You control the vessel or charter. If your business books charters, part-cargoes, or has strong stevedoring relationships at the load port, FAS lets you keep control of loading arrangements — often at better rates than the seller would negotiate.
- You have marine cargo insurance from the alongside point. Your policy should be checked to confirm it attaches when goods are placed alongside, not just when loaded aboard.
- The seller has quayside expertise but no vessel loading capability. Common for smaller mills, yards and manufacturers who can truck cargo to the port but don't manage vessel loading themselves.
- Bulk or breakbulk consolidations where you're consolidating cargo from multiple sellers at the same port before loading a single vessel.
Where FAS commonly goes wrong
- Vague named place. "FAS Belgium" or "FAS Europe" is meaningless. Specify the port, the berth, and the loading position: "FAS berth 218, Antwerp Port, Incoterms 2020".
- Assuming the seller loads. Under FAS, loading onto the vessel is the buyer's responsibility. Contract disputes over "who was supposed to book the crane" are common on first-time FAS deals.
- Insurance not attaching from alongside. Some policies attach only when the goods are on board or in transit. Under FAS, the risk is yours from alongside — check your policy wording.
- Vessel delay. If the buyer's nominated vessel is delayed by a week, cargo sits on the quay accruing storage. The FAS contract should specify who bears storage costs during unforeseen delays.
- Missing packing declarations. Some destinations (e.g. Australia, US) require ISPM-15 fumigation declarations for wooden packaging. Under FAS the seller usually provides these, but the buyer should confirm before quay handover.
- Using FAS for containers. If the "vessel" is actually a container ship, FAS is a mismatch. Switch to FCA or FOB.
FAS vs FOB — the key comparison
These two sea-freight Incoterms look almost identical on paper, but the difference matters in bulk and breakbulk:
| FAS | FOB |
| Seller delivers to | Alongside the vessel | On board the vessel |
| Loading cost paid by | Buyer | Seller |
| Risk during loading | Buyer | Seller |
| Typical trades | Bulk, breakbulk, project | Historically containers; also breakbulk |
| Named place format | FAS [port + berth] | FOB [port] |
| Buyer needs | Vessel + loading arrangement | Vessel booking only |
For most UK importers, FOB is the more familiar and safer default unless there's a specific commercial reason to use FAS. When in doubt, ask your freight forwarder to review the underlying loading arrangement before agreeing to FAS.
Questions to settle before agreeing FAS
- Exact named place: port, berth, loading position, and the vessel or vessel-type expected.
- Who books and pays for: stevedores, cranes, dockers' labour, vessel loading time, port pass fees.
- Cargo insurance: attaches from the moment goods are alongside; ICC (A) all-risks cover recommended for higher-value cargo.
- Vessel delay: who pays for storage, demurrage, and any deterioration if the vessel is delayed?
- Export documents: commercial invoice, packing list, ISPM-15 for wooden packaging, certificate of origin if preferential duty is being claimed.
- Charter party interaction: if the buyer has a charter party with a shipowner, how does FAS interact with the charter party terms (laytime, notice of readiness, etc.)?
- Damaged cargo protocol: if cargo is damaged during loading, who is on hook — buyer (risk from alongside), or seller (contractually if the damage arose before alongside handover)?
FAS documentation checklist
For a smooth FAS shipment, the buyer should ensure they receive from the seller:
- Commercial invoice specifying FAS terms, port, berth
- Packing list with weights, dimensions, marks and numbers
- Export clearance evidence (customs declaration reference)
- Any required certificates: origin, phytosanitary, health, radiation, ISPM-15
- Advice of readiness at quay (date, time, exact position)
- Photos of cargo condition at alongside handover (helpful for later disputes)
And the buyer should have in place:
- Vessel booking or charter party
- Stevedoring contract at the load port
- Marine cargo insurance certificate covering from alongside
- Bill of Lading or Mate's Receipt process agreed with the shipowner
Practical shipment example — steel coils from Genoa
A UK stockholder buys 6 x 22-tonne steel coils from a mill in Northern Italy on FAS Genoa terms.
The seller trucks the coils to Genoa, clears them for export, and places them on the quay alongside the buyer's nominated breakbulk vessel. From that alongside point, the buyer's stevedoring contractor takes over — using shoreside cranes to lift the coils into the vessel's holds. The buyer's marine cargo policy attaches from the moment the coils are alongside.
Vessel loading takes 6 hours. During loading, one coil is dropped by the crane, damaging the outer wrap and 40 tonnes of underlying coils. Because risk transferred at alongside handover, the loss is the buyer's — recovered through their marine cargo insurance policy, which pays under the ICC (A) clauses. Had this been FOB, the seller's insurance would have responded because risk wouldn't have transferred until the coils were safely on board.
That real-world scenario is why the FAS vs FOB distinction matters commercially. For a UK buyer regularly importing breakbulk cargo, either choice can work — but the marine insurance policy needs to be sized and worded appropriately for the term.
Verdict
Bottom line: FAS is a specialist term for bulk, breakbulk and project cargo where loading is a meaningful commercial variable. For containers, use
FCA. For most containerised sea freight from the Far East, use
FOB. If your business regularly imports steel, timber, machinery, or project cargo through European or Mediterranean ports, FAS is a term you need to understand — including the insurance implications and the loading cost allocation.
Related Incoterms and guides